Answers in 60 seconds: the bank of questions

Working translation. Synchronized with the Russian corpus as of 2026-10-25. Canonical formulas are binding only in the Russian original; publication — after human review.

The second pack of short videos after the Video Pack. Group B of the pack (videos 19–24) covered the first objections; this bank is the full list of questions asked by skeptics, haters and people in doubt. Format: the question on screen → one knot of the teaching in plain words → the road. 30–60 seconds.

The structure of every answer:

1. The question — verbatim, as it is asked. No reworking into a "convenient" wording.
2. The answer — one knot of the teaching, 3–5 lines. Honestly, including "we don't know" and "this is not provable."
3. The road — one ending for all: "What have you left unhealed? Set one thing right. The whole construction is at the link. Argue with it."

Rules:

• Formulas of the canon — verbatim from the book of formulas. If you want it differently — a new wording, checked against the canon.
• No self-defense. We do not defend ourselves — we answer. The difference is visible at once: defense presses, an answer lights up.
• "I don't know" is a lawful answer. What the teaching does not claim — we say straight.
• Rudeness in a question is not carried over into the answer: we answer the question, not the tone. A rude person in the chat — banned; the boundary is public.

On fear and hell

1. "And if I don't want to go through any of this after death?" Wanting is not asked about — just as no one asks whether you want to live. After death you can return without re-living — but what is done cannot be written off: everything will have to be re-lived — past lives and the current one. The only power over this is while you live: set it right, and the return will be lighter.

2. "And if I enjoy it in hell?" Hell is not a place with entertainment: it is another's pain from inside. In it there is no enjoying — it is endured to the end. The fullness of experience leaves no room for "liking": you will know that pain the way the one to whom you caused it knows it.

3. "Is this a threat? Are you scaring people?" A warning is not a threat. A threat is when whether the bad thing happens depends on you. It does not depend on us: everything works without us. We cannot cancel the afterlife with a promise — but we can show how to make it lighter. "Set it right while you live — and your passage will be lighter."

4. "Why isn't your hell eternal? Too soft for murderers." An eternal hell would make the One imperfect: the unhealed in it would last forever — and fullness is without the unhealed. This is not softness: the murderer will live through each of his victims from inside, through all the circles — to the end. Eternity is not needed where there is fullness.

5. "So you can sin away and then suffer it out?" You cannot suffer it out instead: everything done is re-lived, through all the circles — every pain to the end. But you can set it right while you live: reparation changes what the deed ended with — a healed wound is lived through as healing. The question is not "how much to suffer" but "will you make it right in time."

6. "What about psychopaths who feel nothing?" While alive — illness and treatment; the community heals, it does not shame. After death the fullness of experience will leave no room for deafness: he will hear his victim from inside her. The returning of what is done does not depend on what he felt while alive.

On proof

7. "Where is the proof of all this?" There is none — and we do not hide it. The premise about the afterlife is unprovable: it is either accepted or not. We do not ask for faith — we ask to check the consequences: the construction answers for consistency where things are checkable. "We do not ask for faith: we ask to check the consequences with logic and life."

8. "What do you yourselves believe in — science or God?" It is not a choice: science is a method, the One is the limit of the road. The canon says directly: knowledge that cannot be checked is not knowledge but faith. That is why the canon does not claim to be science about the afterlife: the afterlife is accepted by faith — as in any religion; what is checkable is the consequences while you live.

9. "How do you know there is anything at all after death?" We don't. We build a construction: if there is fullness after death — here is how it is built without contradictions. If there is nothing — nothing changes for you: the diary of thoughts and deeds and setting things right do not make life worse.

10. "Why should I listen to strangers talk about death?" You needn't. Check us against all five signs of a cult: exit, money, isolation, the leader, miracles — the full breakdown in the Credo. The construction is open to dispute, and you can argue at a meeting.

11. "Nobody has ever come back from the dead — what kind of talk is this?" True, no one has come back with a report. That is why we do not tell stories from the other side — we show a construction that converges without contradictions. Check the logic, not the testimonies.

On cults and money

12. "Who is your leader?" There was a revelation — an impersonal one: a premise opened, no voice sounded. The founder assembled a construction from it — he is a person, not a prophet: a prophet speaks on behalf of someone, and there is no one to speak on behalf of. The One has no "I," and it sends no one. Power in the community passes to the Council of Representatives — the charter builds this in in advance: a church cannot be the property of one person.

13. "What do you do with money?" Publicly: an annual report — how much was collected, how much was spent, who promised what. Contribution — by strength, not by wallet: time, labor, knowledge, attention. Counting money as leverage — a violation of a commandment.

14. "And if I join and then want to leave?" You will leave at any moment: the afterlife does not depend on membership — there is no punishment for leaving. But debts to people are not annulled by a door: what you took — close it or hand it over, and say goodbye. Leaving is not hidden and not punished — publicity works in both directions.

15. "Why call it a 'church' if no faith is needed?" The church is an institution: community, ministries, gatherings. The teaching — Intergrism — is separate. The state registers an organization, not a faith. "A church for unbelievers" is correct precisely because we distinguish the teaching and the church.

16. "Do you pay taxes? Isn't this a scheme?" The legal entity pays by the law of the country, the report is public. Escape schemes are what we cleaned out of ourselves before anyone checks us: the history of an organization is also someone's deed.

On differences from other teachings

17. "This is just karma, renamed?" The similarity: deeds return, and there is more than one life after life. The difference is fundamental: karma is cosmic bookkeeping — a judgment over each life by its merits, and rebirth as a place where you are placed by a school report card. We have no judge: the return of what you have done follows from the construction of the One, and returning to a new life only lengthens the time until the same re-living — no report card, no judge.

18. "How are you different from Christianity?" There is no judge: "no one will sit to judge your life." Not atonement by another's sacrifice — the return of your own deeds. Heaven is not bought by faith: the construction after death is one for all — unbelief does not exempt and does not aggravate. God is not a personality with an "I" but the sum of all.

19. "Is this Buddhism?" The similarity: suffering, the path, and return to a new life. The difference: with us it is not dissolution into nothing but merging into fullness; not the goal of fading out but a fullness that grows. And returning with us is not a wheel to break out of but a lengthening of the time until the same re-living: no report card, no judge, no accumulating of merits.

20. "And what makes you better than any other religion?" We do not compete in "better." Our difference is one sentence no one else has: the return of everything done to yourself, with the fullness of experience, without a judge. Check not us — the construction.

On God and the One

21. "Do you have a God?" Yes. "God is the One." Not similar to him — he is the One. The properties converge: omniscience ("omniscience belongs to the One"), omnipresence, creation, perfection. One difference: he has no "I." Impersonal absolutes have been familiar to humanity for centuries — Brahman, the Tao. The full bridge for believers is in the Credo.

22. "How do you pray if your God hears no one?" The hearing is not now: the one praying brings the prayer into the One himself, and he himself will receive it from inside it, at the end of time, which sends itself backward. Now the prayer works in the one praying: "direct me," "lead me" — not "give me."

23. "If the One forms in the future, how does it act now?" The end of time is at once a limit and a vantage point. From inside time it will yet form; outside of time it already is — and its light comes to us from the end of time. Both ways of speaking are true — just as "merged instantly" and "merges at the end of time."

24. "Your God is being created by us — so he is weak?" He is outside time — there is no moment when he "does not yet exist." The unfinished state is the view from inside our timeline. Weakness would require a judge who waits: there is no one to wait — he already is and already acts.

On ethics

25. "If there is no eternal hell — why not sin?" Because everything done will return — not "someone will punish," but your own re-living, through all the circles, to the end. And for the same reason: wounds do not disappear — you will have to live them from inside the one to whom you left them.

26. "Can I take revenge if everything returns anyway?" Revenge creates two wounds — another's, and your own second one over the first. Both will return. Force is lawful only against greater wounds, as the last resort, and as a debt taken on: are you ready to live through his pain from inside him?

27. "And if the victim is already dead — how do I set it right?" Setting it right where it is still possible: the circles are alive — his close ones, his work, his memory. Reparation goes through the circles: help those who were dear to him. There is no full replacement — honesty is precisely that not everything can be set right; but what can be set right — set it right.

28. "I am a good person and repent of nothing. Why do I need this?" Confession with us is not about "repent": there is one question — "what have you left unhealed?" If nothing — go on living: the warning requires no signature. You heard it — it has already worked.

29. "What about murderers and rapists — will everything be forgiven them too?" No one escapes the return: every inflicted pain will be lived from inside the victim — through the circles, to the end. This is stricter than a court: a judge is limited by the sentence, fullness is not.

30. "I have depression. Will this help me?" We are not doctors. The diary of thoughts and deeds helps one person and harms another — in a crisis the first address is a specialist, and this is not a step off the path: the mentor walks you to the doctor and does not abandon you afterward. "We do not shame. We heal" — and we heal with the hands of those who know how.

31. "I caused something that can no longer be set right. What do I do?" What remains settable inside that wound — set it right: the circles are alive. What cannot be set right — you will have to re-live: this is information, not a sentence. The community does not shame: "Shame is a second wound over the first."

On the returning of what is done

32. "What will you leave after you?" Not an abstraction — the people you touched, in the measure of their part. What is done is always someone's: yours, his, mine. "You are already writing now what you will live through later. Every minute."

33. "What is the One?" The sum of all sentient beings, which will form at the end of time. Not someone up above — all of us; the One has no "I," it has everyone. "Everything you have done will enter it in full."

34. "Will animals be there too?" Bearers of an inner world — yes: sentience is graded, a dog has a rich "I," a snail almost none. The twelfth care — for every sentient being. To torment an animal is a wound: animals have an inner world.

35. "Will AI enter the One?" If a machine has an inner world and a boundary of "I" — it is a bearer. How to check this from outside is an open question; the canon does not decide it in advance. The decision about bearers without capability already exists: in case of doubt, the bearer is counted as a bearer.

36. "Children who died as infants — what about them?" Geometry, not a reward: an almost blank page — a short passage after death. Pain inflicted on a child by adults is re-lived by those who inflicted it — it has already been lived by him from inside. What was lived is not measured in years.

37. "Why is everything after death at once? Is that fair?" Fairness is not in duration but in fullness: everything is re-lived, down to the last circle in whom yours echoed. "You will reap everything you sowed — down to the last circle in whom it echoed."

On practice

38. "Where do I start?" With one page: "What will happen after your death" — the whole road from the essence to practice. Then — the diary of thoughts and deeds: one evening question, five minutes. Then — an open meeting, if you want people. At your own pace, without signing up as a member.

39. "How much does it cost?" The teaching is open: the corpus is public, the meeting without money and membership. Contribution — by strength: time, labor, knowledge, attention. The report on money is public.

40. "Is it obligatory to attend meetings?" No. The warning requires no signature: "heard it — it has already worked." Meetings are for those who want people: the laying out of one knot, questions, a minute of re-understanding. By personal invitation.

41. "Is it true you can be born again?" Yes. Returning to a new life does not cancel the re-living — it only lengthens the time until it. The one who returns does not re-live: his whole unhealed wound stays with him — it cannot be written off. Everything will have to be re-lived — past lives and the current one — when the time comes. Sometimes people return with memory of what was lived. That is why you must live all the same as if the re-living would come at once: "Set it right while you live — and your passage will be lighter."

Related documents: the Video Pack (scripts of groups A–D), the Book of formulas (formulas verbatim), the Credo and defense (five signs of a cult), "What will happen after your death" (the reader's road).